ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
Member Login  |  Email:  Password    Not a member?  Join now!
home
 Search:  browse by topicbrowse by publicationhelp

Seminary &
Grad School Guide
Search by Name
 

or use:
Advanced Search
to search by major, region, cost, affiliation, enrollment, more!


Member Services
My Account
Contact Us
Christianity TodayMayMay 2009

FREE ARTICLE PREVIEW

 ARTICLE TOOLS


In Over His Pay Grade
When science is made 'apolitical' and 'unencumbered by religion,' it's usually to hyper-politicize and hyper-sacralize it.



Only 53 percent of adults know how long it takes the earth to revolve around the sun, a national survey commissioned by the California Academy of Sciences showed. That's sad, if not surprising. But former President and Rhodes Scholar Bill Clinton also revealed a startling ignorance about basic science shortly after President Barack Obama increased federal funding of stem-cell research that destroys embryos.

After CNN presented him as a policy expert on the matter, Clinton referred a half-dozen times to human embryos as "unfertilized" and said they would only "become human beings" if they were fertilized, which couldn't happen with the embryos in question.

Of course, embryo is the scientific term for the growing human in its first couple months of existence. The ones being used and destroyed for stem-cell research are about four to five days old. And fertilization, as schoolchildren know, is when the sperm and ovum unite. Without fertilization, there is no embryo.

And yet the mainstream media portrayed George W. Bush, not Clinton, as the former President who disregarded science. Expanding embryonic stem-cell research, the media and the White House told us, was about returning science to its "rightful place" and removing the Bush administration's backward ideological agenda from scientific decision making.

If science is all that matters, why did Obama fail to mention—and yet remove explicit funding for—the science that has produced the biological equivalent of embryonic stem cells without destroying embryos?

And if science should be free from any religious influence, why did Obama bring in religious leaders from mainline Protestant denominations and Jewish organizations for the embryonic stem-cell signing ceremony? ...



Are you a CTLibrary member or a Christianity Today subscriber with archives privileges?
To read the rest of this article, log in here:
Email  Password  

If you're a Christianity Today print subscriber...
...but have not yet registered for online access to CTLibrary.com, you can receive a full-year's access for just $29.95!

Register Here
 If you're NOT a Christianity Today print subscriber...
You're entitled to a special, introductory offer for new subscribers only! Subscribe now and receive a one-year Christianity Today print magazine subscription and one-year access to all Christianity Today archives for just $39.95!

Subscribe now!


Subscribe!



Subscribe now

Give a gift subscription



Shopping
ChristianBook.com
  Books|Music|Videos|Gifts

Bible Studies
Leadership Training
Small Group Resources

Featured Items