ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
Member Login  |  E-mail:  Password    Not a member?  Join now!
home
 Search:  browse by topicbrowse by publicationhelp

Seminary &
Grad School Guide
Search by Name
 

or use:
Advanced Search
to search by major, region, cost, affiliation, enrollment, more!

Search by
Location & Setting
Programs & Degrees
Enrollment
Affiliation
Athletics
Costs, Scholarships & Grants
List All Schools


Member Services
My Account
Contact Us
Christianity TodayApril 2005

FREE ARTICLE PREVIEW

 ARTICLE TOOLS


How Serious Are Democrats?
Making abortion rare will take more than words.



There's much to cheer in some leading Democrats calling their party to change course on abortion rhetoric. There's John Kerry proclaiming in January, "I don't want abortion. Abortion should be the rarest thing in the world." There's Howard Dean leading off a speech to women Democratic leaders, "We are not pro-abortion! There is not anyone I know who is pro-abortion." Most notably, there's Hillary Clinton describing abortion as "a sad, even tragic choice."

In short, we have congressional agreement on both sides of the aisle that abortion is tragic. The abortion landscape has changed in this country, and the culture of life has gained significant ground. There is hope for legislative movement as we haven't seen in years.

But beware. An ad from NARAL Pro-Choice America addressed to "the right-to-life movement" would be almost humorous if it weren't for those 1.3 million killings annually in this country. "Please Help Us Prevent Abortions," says the ad, which appeared in The Weekly Standard and other publications. Actually, the headline is misleading: The text of the ad explains better its call for support of a bill "which would reduce unwanted pregnancies." The legislation, Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid's Prevention First Act (co-sponsored by Democrats with 100 percent ratings from abortion-rights groups and 0 percent ratings from pro-life groups), is a pro-life nightmare. It would double federal funds to "family planning" groups like Planned Parenthood and NARAL while barring funds for programs that emphasize sexual abstinence. Hospitals that get any federal funds would have to provide the morning-after pill (which prevents fertilized eggs from implanting in the uterus) on demand, and companies that oppose contraception ...



Are you a CTLibrary member or a Christianity Today subscriber with archives privileges?
To read the rest of this article, log in here:
E-mail  Password  

If you're a Christianity Today print subscriber...
...but have not yet registered for online access to CTLibrary.com, you can receive a full-year's access for just $29.95!

Register Here
 If you're NOT a Christianity Today print subscriber...
You're entitled to a special, introductory offer for new subscribers only! Subscribe now and receive a one-year Christianity Today print magazine subscription and one-year access to all Christianity Today archives for just $39.95!

Subscribe now!


Subscribe!

Subscribe to Christianity Today
Risk-free trial issue

Give a gift subscription


Shopping
ChristianBook.com
  Books|Music|Videos|Gifts

Bible Studies
Christian History
Leadership Training
Small Group Resources

Featured Items




















Subscribe to CTDirect
Get CT headlines in your mailbox every day!




ChristianityToday.com
HomeCT MagChurch/MinistryBible/LifeCommunitiesEntertainmentSchools/JobsShoppingFree!Help
Magazines:
Books & Culture
Christianity Today
Church Law & Tax Report
Church Finance Today
Leadership Journal

Men of Integrity
Today's Christian Woman
Your Church
ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
Resources:
BuildingChurchLeaders.com
ChristianBibleStudies.com
Christian College Guide
ChristianHistory.net
Christian Music Today
Christianity Today Movies

Church Products & Services
Church Safety
ChurchSiteCreator.com
PreachingToday.com
PreachingTodaySermons.com
Seminary/Grad School Guide


Christianity Today International
www.ChristianityToday.com
Copyright © 1994–2009 Christianity Today International
Privacy Policy | Contact Us | Advertise with Us